Leveraging open source land use and land cover data for urban and regional planning in transforming areas

REFERENCES

• Adams, C., Frantzeskaki, N., & Moglia, M. (2023). Mainstreaming nature-based solutions in cities: A systematic literature review and a proposal for facilitating urban transitions. Land Use Policy, 130, 106661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106661
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Albert, C., Aronson, J., Fürst, C., & Opdam, P. (2014). Integrating ecosystem services in landscape planning: Requirements, approaches, and impacts. Landscape Ecology, 29(8), 1277–1285. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-014-0085-0
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Albert, C., Galler, C., Hermes, J., Neuendorf, F., Haaren, C. v., & Lovett, A. (2016). Applying ecosystem services indicators in landscape planning and management: The ES-in-Planning framework. Ecological Indicators, 61, 100–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.029
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Alves Dias, P., Kanellopoulos, K., Medarac, H., Kapetaki, Z., Miranda-Barbosa, E., Shortall, R., Czako, V., Telsnig, T., Vazquez-Hernandez, C., Lacal Arántegui, R., Nijs, W., Gonzalez Aparicio, I., Trombetti, M., Mandras, G., Peteves, E., & Tzimas, E. (2018). Eu coal regions: Opportunities and challenges ahead (EUR JRC112593). Europäische Kommission. https://publications.europa.eu/de/publication-detail/-/publication/de175603-896a-11e8-ac6a-01aa75ed71a1/language-en/format-PDF/source-73929634(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Avera, B. N., Strahm, B. D., Burger, J. A., & Zipper, C. E. (2015). Development of ecosystem structure and function on reforested surface-mined lands in the Central Appalachian Coal Basin of the United States. New Forests, 46(5-6), 683–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-015-9502-8
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Babí Almenar, J., Rugani, B., Geneletti, D., & Brewer, T. (2018). Integration of ecosystem services into a conceptual spatial planning framework based on a landscape ecology perspective. Landscape Ecology, 33(12), 2047–2059. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0727-8
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• BauGB. (2023). (2023 & rev. last modification by Art. 1 G 07/280/2023 I Nr. 221). https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/bbaug/index.html(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Baum, H. (2015). Planning with half a mind: Why planners resist emotion. Planning Theory & Practice, 16(4), 498–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1071870
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Berkner, A., Dähnhardt, G., Falke, J., König, A., Kynast, K., Lüdenbach, K., Müller, V., Renz, A., Schilling, M., & Sehrig, M. (2022). Lignite planning, structural change and coal phase-out in Germany (Positionspapier aus der ARL No. 140). ARL.
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• BfN. (2010). Karte der potentiellen natürlichen Vegetation Deutschlands. Maßstab 1:500.000 [Map of potential natural vegetation in Germany. Scale 1:500.000].
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• BKG. (2020). Basis-DLM NRW. https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/geobasis/lm/basis-dlm/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Burkhard, B., Lange, S., Müller, F., Schweppe-Kraft, B., Grunewald, K., Syrbe, R-U, Lupp, G., Bastian, O., & Holfeld, M. (2023). Methoden der Erfassung und Bewertung von Ökosystemleistungen. In K. Grunewald, & O. Bastian (Eds.), Ökosystemleistungen (pp. 137–250). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-65916-8_4
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Costanza, R., d'Arge, R., Groot, R. d., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O'neill, R. V., & Paruelo, J. (1997). The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Deppisch, S., Heitmann, A., Savaşçı, G., & Lezuo, D. (2022). Ökosystemleistungen in Instrumenten der Stadt- und Regionalplanung. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning, 80(1), 58–79. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.122
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Díaz, S., Pascual, U., Stenseke, M., Martín-López, B., Watson, R. T., Molnár, Z., Hill, R., Chan, K. M. A., Baste, I. A., Brauman, K. A., Polasky, S., Church, A., Lonsdale, M., Larigauderie, A., Leadley, P. W., van Oudenhoven, A. P. E., van der Plaat, F., Schröter, M., Lavorel, S., … Shirayama, Y. (2018). Assessing nature's contributions to people. Science, 359(6373), 270–272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap8826
   (Open in a new window)PubMed (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Esri. (2022). ArcGIS Pro 3.0.0 [Computer software].
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2016). EU-DEM (raster) - version 1.0.
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Federal Ministry of Finance. (2023). data.gv.at. https://www.data.gv.at/en/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Federal Office of Topography. (2023). Free basic geodata (OGD). https://www.swisstopo.admin.ch/en/swisstopo/free-geodata.html(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Fienitz, M., Busse, M., Fienitz, M., & Heiland, S. (2022). Analysing the impact of communication and public participation on the acceptability of Germany’s Black Forest National Park. Journal for Nature Conservation, 67, 126155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2022.126155
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Galler, C., Albert, C., & Haaren, C. v. (2016). From regional environmental planning to implementation: Paths and challenges of integrating ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 18, 118–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.031
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Geobasis NRW. (2020). Digitale Verwaltungsgrenzen NW (hohe Stützpunktdichte). https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/geobasis/vkg/dvg/dvg1/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Geologischer Dienst NRW. (2017). Bodenkarte von Nordrhein-Westfalen 1: 50 000. Geologischer Dienst NRW. https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/geologie/boden/BK/ISBK50/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Greiving, S., Gruehn, D., & Reicher, C. (2022). The Rhenish coal-mining area—assessing the transformational talents and challenges of a region in fundamental structural change. Land, 11(6), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11060826
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Grunewald, K., Bastian, O., Louda, J., Arcidiacono, A., Brzoska, P., Bue, M., Cetin, N. I., Dworczyk, C., Dubova, L., Fitch, A., Jones, L., La Rosa, D., Mascarenhas, A., Ronchi, S., Schlaepfer, M. A., Sikorska, D., & Tezer, A. (2021). Lessons learned from implementing the ecosystem services concept in urban planning. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101273
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Hague, C., Higgins, M., Jenkins, P., Kirk, K., Prior, A., Smith, H., Elwood, S., Hague, E., Papadopoulos, A., & Grimes, W. (2003). Participatory Planning for Sustainable Communities: International Experience. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Hao, J., Zhu, J., & Zhong, R. (2015). The rise of big data on urban studies and planning practices in China: Review and open research issues. Journal of Urban Management, 4(2), 92–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2015.11.002
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Hoch, C. (2006). Emotions and Planning. Planning Theory & Practice, 7(4), 367–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350600984436
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Hüttl, R. F., & Weber, E. (2001). Forest ecosystem development in post-mining landscapes: A case study of the Lusatian lignite district. Die Naturwissenschaften, 88(8), 322–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001140100241
   (Open in a new window)PubMed(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• INSPIRE Directive (Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community). (2007). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2007/2/oj(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2021). Technical Summary - IPCC AR6 WG1. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896.002
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Kabisch, N. (2015). Ecosystem service implementation and governance challenges in urban green space planning—The case of Berlin, Germany. Land Use Policy, 42, 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.09.005
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Kiese, M. (2019). Strukturwandel 2.0: Das Ruhrgebiet auf dem Weg zur Wissensökonomie? Standort, 43(2), 69–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00548-019-00581-6
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Klopfer, F., Greiving, S., & Gruehn, D. (2022). Creating an evidence base for managing structural change in the Rhineland Mining Area—evaluating open space applying a comprehensive set of indicators. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 66(11), 2406–2423. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2022.2062310
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• LANUV. (2017). Wasserhaushaltsmodell mGROWA. https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/umwelt_klima/wasser/grundwasser/mgrowa/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• LANUV. (2018). Flächendeckende Bewertung des Landschaftsbildes in Nordrhein-Westfalen. https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/umwelt_klima/naturschutz/landschaftsbildeinheiten/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• LANUV. (2019). FIS Klimaanpassung: Klimaanalyse Planungskarten für NRW. https://www.opengeodata.nrw.de/produkte/umwelt_klima/klima/klimaanpassung/planungskarten/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• LANUV. (2020). LINFOS NRW. http://linfos.naturschutzinformationen.nrw.de/atlinfos/de/start(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Long, Y., & Liu, L. (2016). Transformations of urban studies and planning in the big/open data era: A review. International Journal of Image and Data Fusion, 7(4), 295–308. https://doi.org/10.1080/19479832.2016.1215355
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Longato, D., Cortinovis, C., Albert, C., & Geneletti, D. (2021). Practical applications of ecosystem services in spatial planning: Lessons learned from a systematic literature review. Environmental Science & Policy, 119, 72–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.02.001
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Mager, C., Wagner, M., & Growe, A. (2022). Bilanzierende Ökosystemdienstleistungsanalyse als Werkzeug in Kommunikationsprozessen der partizipativen Planung? Raumforschung Und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning, 80(1), 40–57. https://doi.org/10.14512/rur.68
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• MEA. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis; a report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island Press. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/enhancements/fy0666/2005010265-d.html(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Ministerium für Heimat, Kommunales, Bau und Digitalisierung des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. (2023). Open.NRW. https://open.nrw/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• MWIKE NRW. (2022). Kohleausstieg 2030 im Rheinischen Revier. https://www.wirtschaft.nrw/themen/energie/kohleausstieg-2030(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Oei, P-Y, Hermann, H., Herpich, P., Holtemöller, O., Lünenbürger, B., & Schult, C. (2020). Coal phase-out in Germany – Implications and policies for affected regions. Energy, 196, 117004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117004
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• OpenStreetMap contributors. (2023). OpenStreetMap (OSM). https://www.openstreetmap.org(open in a new window).
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Qiu, L., Dong, Y., & Liu, H. (2022). Integrating ecosystem services into planning practice: Situation, challenges and inspirations. Land, 11(4), 545. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11040545
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Röhl, K-H. (2019). Das Ruhrgebiet: der anhaltende industrielle Strukturwandel im Spiegel der Regionalpolitik. Wirtschaftsdienst (Hamburg, Germany), 99(S1), 49–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10273-019-2432-x
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Ronchi, S. (2021). Ecosystem services for planning: A generic recommendation or a real framework? Insights from a literature review. Sustainability, 13(12), 6595. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13126595
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Schröter, M., Kraemer, R., Mantel, M., Kabisch, N., Hecker, S., Richter, A., Neumeier, V., & Bonn, A. (2017). Citizen science for assessing ecosystem services: Status, challenges and opportunities. Ecosystem Services, 28, 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.09.017
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Statistisches Bundesamt. (2019). Bevölkerung im Wandel: Annahmen und Ergebnisse der 14. koordinierten Bevölkerungsvorausberechnung. Statistisches Bundesamt.
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Ecological and economic foundations; [TEEB: The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity ([Paperback ed.]). Routledge.
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• van Oudenhoven, A. P., Schröter, M., Drakou, E. G., Geijzendorffer, I. R., Jacobs, S., van Bodegom, P. M., Chazee, L., Czúcz, B., Grunewald, K., Lillebø, A. I., Mononen, L., Nogueira, A. J., Pacheco-Romero, M., Perennou, C., Remme, R. P., Rova, S., Syrbe, R-U, Tratalos, J. A., Vallejos, M., & Albert, C. (2018). Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making. Ecological Indicators, 95, 417–426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.020
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Walz, U. (2011). Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Reviews in Landscape Research, 5(3), 1–35.
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Wamsler, C., Alkan-Olsson, J., Björn, H., Falck, H., Hanson, H., Oskarsson, T., Simonsson, E., & Zelmerlow, F. (2020). Beyond participation: When citizen engagement leads to undesirable outcomes for nature-based solutions and climate change adaptation. Climatic Change, 158(2), 235–254. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02557-9
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Warren-Kretzschmar, B., & Haaren, C. v. (2014). Communicating spatial planning decisions at the landscape and farm level with landscape visualization. IForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 7(6), 434–442. https://doi.org/10.3832/ifor1175-007
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Wei, F., & Zhan, X. (2023). A review of ES knowledge use in spatial planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 139, 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2022.11.003
   (Open in a new window)Web of Science ®(Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Zukunftsagentur Rheinisches Revier. (2019). Regionales Freiraumsystem Rheinisches Revier 1.0: Erfassung und Konzeption. ZRR. https://www.rheinisches-revier.de/media/190601_regionales_freiraumsystem_1.0_web.pdf(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Zukunftsagentur Rheinisches Revier. (2021). Wirtschafts- und Strukturprogramm 1.1 für das Rheinische Zukunftsrevier. Jülich. https://www.rheinisches-revier.de/was/wirtschafts-und-strukturprogramm/(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar
• Zukunftsagentur Rheinisches Revier. (2022). Endergebnisse der Mehrfachbeauftragung. https://www.raum-strategie.de/uebersicht-ergebnisse(open in a new window)
   (Open in a new window)Google Scholar